Vancouver, British Columbia, January 30, 2009
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell
BETWEEN:
AMANPREET SINGH ARORA
Applicant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
[1] In the present case, the Applicant applied for landing in the skilled worker class. In rejecting the Applicant’s application, the Visa Officer determined that the Applicant had not “performed a substantial number of the main duties” in the job classifications for which he applied (CAIPS Notes, Applicant’s Application Record, p. 14).
[2] Counsel for the Applicant relies on Justice Noël’s decision in Noman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] F.C.J. No. 1568 at paragraph 29 to argue that the Visa Officer erred in law because all that is required of the Applicant is that he establish that he has performed “some” of the duties in three of the four job categories in which he applied. I agree with Counsel for the Applicant’s argument that Justice Noël’s finding is correct. As a result, I find the Visa Officer’s decision is rendered in reviewable error.
ORDER
Accordingly, I set aside the Visa Officer’s decision and refer the matter back to a different visa officer for re-determination.
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: IMM-550-08
STYLE OF CAUSE: AMANPREET SINGH ARORA v. THE MINISTER OF
CITIZENSHIP
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 20, 2009
APPEARANCES:
Rocco Galati
|
|
Judy Michaely
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Rocco Galati Law Firm Professional Corporation Toronto, Ontario
|
|
John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|
|