Ottawa, Ontario, November 16, 2007
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Barnes
BETWEEN:
and
AND IMMIGRATION
SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
[1] Subsequent to the hearing of this application, but before my decision was rendered, counsel for the Applicant proposed the following question for certification:
Does a PRRA officer err in law if that officer relies upon guidelines prepared by a foreign government with respect to determining a question of law or mixed fact and law that is within the jurisdiction of that officer?
[2] Counsel for the Respondent objected to the proposed question on the ground that it would not be determinative.
[3] In my decision of October 16, 2007, I invited the Applicant’s counsel to propose a question for certification having regard to the reasons then given. Nothing further was submitted.
[4] I do not believe that the question posed by the Applicant arises on the reasons given for dismissing his application. In the result, I decline to certify the question proposed.
JUDGMENT
THIS COURT ADJUDGES that no question will be certified in this proceeding.
“ R. L. Barnes ”
Judge
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: IMM-1426-07
STYLE OF CAUSE: ASHLEY FRANCISCO RODRIGUES
v.
MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS
APPEARANCES:
Lorne Waldman
|
|
Kristina Dragaitis
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Lorne Waldman Barrister and Solicitor Toronto, Ontario
|
|
John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|