Ottawa, Ontario, October 30, 2007
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan
BETWEEN:
and
THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
[1] The facts of this judicial review are largely set out in the Reasons for Judgment in Haiyan Lyew v. The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (Lyew) (T-1852-06).
[2] The only material distinction between Lyew’s circumstances and those of Chen are that Chen was carrying more funds, that these included three cheques payable to herself in the amount of $20,000 (U.S.) each and that these cheques, along with the amount declared upon entry into Canada, were returned to her.
[3] For the Reasons given in Lyew, this judicial review will be granted and the Adjudicator’s decision is quashed.
[4] The matter is remitted to the Minister to be reviewed de novo by a different official. The Minister is not required to remit the balance of the seized funds until and unless the final determination of the new review of this matter makes it necessary.
JUDGMENT
THIS COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the application for judicial review is granted and the Adjudicator’s decision is quashed. The matter is to be remitted to the Minister to be reviewed de novo by a different official. The Minister is not required to remit the balance of the seized funds until and unless the final determination of the new review of this matter so requires.
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: T-1853-06
STYLE OF CAUSE: FEIYAN CHEN
and
THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: September 21, 2007
APPEARANCES:
Ms. Wennie Lee
|
|
Mr. Michael Roach
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
LEE & COMPANY Barristers & Solicitors Toronto, Ontario
|
|
MR. JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario |