Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040303

Docket: IMM-1304-04

Citation: 2004 FC 316

Toronto, Ontario, March 3rd, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly                                    

BETWEEN:

                                           PRINCE PHILIP ASEERVATHAM LEGORI

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                   

                                                                                 and

                                                                                   

                                THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                       

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER


[1]                 Mr. Prince Philip Aseervatham Legori has asked me to stay the execution of an order requiring him to leave Canada for his native Sri Lanka on March 4, 2004. He argues that an assessment of the risk he would face on his return to Sri Lanka was faulty. The officer who conducted that assessment, according to Mr. Legori, did not take adequate account of evidence showing that recent events in Sri Lanka expose him, as a Tamil male, to a high risk of mistreatment.

[2]                 Mr. Legori argues that the question whether the officer's approach to the evidence was proper amounts to a serious issue to be tried. Further, he submits that returning him to Sri Lanka now would expose him to irreparable harm. Those arguments, along with his assertion that the balance of convenience lies in permitting him to stay in Canada while pursuing his legal remedies here, he says, satisfy the three-part test for a stay of execution.

[3]                 I am not satisfied that Mr. Legori has presented a serious issue or evidence of irreparable harm. Therefore, I must dismiss this motion.

[4]                 Mr. Legori suggests that the officer's decision, dated January 20, 2004, should have included references to evidence of recent developments in Sri Lanka. The documents referred to by the officer were from 2002 and 2003.

[5]                 In any case, the officer had clearly considered all of the submissions made to him and specifically addressed the situation in Sri Lanka after the breakdown of peace talks in the spring of 2003. I cannot see any serious issue arising from the officer's treatment of that evidence.

[6]                 As for irreparable harm, Mr. Legori's submission is speculative. As he states in his affidavit, he fears that "the latest national political crisis will plunge the country into chaos and re-ignite ethnic tensions and the war between the State and LTTE." If that were to transpire, Mr. Legori could, as a Tamil male, be exposed to a heightened risk of personal harm. But this is not the current situation in Sri Lanka. True, recent events are worrisome; they do not appear, however, to give risk to a present and tangible risk to Mr. Legori. Even considering the most up-to-date evidence, I am not satisfied that Mr. Legori's return to Sri Lanka would expose him to irreparable harm. Accordingly, this motion is dismissed.

                                                                            ORDER

THIS COURT ORDERS that this motion is dismissed.

                                                                                                                                     "James W. O'Reilly"                  

                                                                                                                                                            J.F.C.                                  

                                                                                                                                                                       


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT

                                       Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                                 IMM-1304-04

                                                                                   

STYLE OF CAUSE: PRINCE PHILIP ASEERVATHAM LEGORI     

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:         TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:           MARCH 1, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                  O'REILLY, J.

DATED:                                    MARCH 3, 2004

APPEARANCES BY:

Mr. Robert I. Blanshay   

FOR THE APPLICANT

Ms. Marina Stefanovic

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          

Robert I. Blanshay

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg         

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT


FEDERAL COURT

                                    Date: 20040303

                                    Docket: IMM-1304-04

BETWEEN:

PRINCE PHILIP ASEERVATHAM LEGORI

                                                                       Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                 Respondent

                                                   

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                   


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.