Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040329

Docket: IMM-5805-01

Citation: 2004 FC 477

Toronto, Ontario, March 29th, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell                                

BETWEEN:

                                                              JUAN LING FENG

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                In the present case, by a decision dated December 3, 2001, the Applicant was denied permanent residence in Canada as she did not gain sufficient points on her evaluation by the Visa Officer. Prior to the decision being made rejecting her application, Counsel for the Applicant asked, by way of a letter dated August 13, 2001, that positive discretion be applied under s.11(3) of theImmigration Act Regulations. The letter was not received by the Visa Officer concerned.   

[2]                As a result, the final decision was made by the Visa Officer without knowledge of the request that positive discretion be exercised. It is agreed that, had knowledge existed, the Visa Officer owed a duty to enter into a s.11(3) inquiry.

[3]                On August 31, 2001, a letter was sent by counsel for the Applicant which stated as follows:

"Further to our letter dated August 13, 2001, enclosed please find the updated application form for Ms. Feng Juan Ling and family".

There is no doubt that the August 31st letter was received by the Visa Officer.

[4]                I find that, as a matter of due process, the Visa Officer owed a duty of fairness to the Applicant to inquire into the existence and contents of the letter of August 13, 2001, as it is apparent by the letter August 31, 2001, that Counsel for the Applicant was relying on the fact that the Visa Officer would consider the letter of August 13, 2001. The Visa Officer did not meet this duty of fairness.

[5]                As a result, in my opinion, the Visa Officer's decision was rendered in reviewable error.


                                               ORDER

Accordingly, I set aside the Visa Officer's decision and refer this matter back to another visa officer for redetermination.

The issue of costs is adjourned for argument to May 3, 2004 at 3:00 p.m. in Toronto, Ontario.

"Douglas R. Campbell"

                                                                                                   J.F.C.                         


FEDERAL COURT

    NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                         IMM-5805-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:         JUAN LING FENG

                                                                                              Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                          Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:     MARCH 25, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY :        CAMPBELL J.

DATED:                            MARCH 29, 2004

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Inna Kogan

FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. Marcel Larouche

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Ms. Inna Kogan

Barrister & Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario                            

                                                                        FOR THE APPLICANT

                                                     

Morris Rosenberg                                             

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario                                               FOR THE RESPONDENT


             FEDERAL COURT

TRIAL DIVISION

                             

Date: 20040329

Docket: IMM-5805-01

BETWEEN:

JUAN LING FENG

                                                           

                                            Applicant

and                                                      

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                        Respondent

                                                                      

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                                      

                                                           


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.