Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040325

Docket: IMM-4623-03

Citation: 2004 FC 459

Toronto, Ontario, March 25th, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell                                

BETWEEN:

                                                            EMMANUEL BAAH

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER


[1]                In the present case, the Applicant claims refugee protection from future political persecution in Sierra Leone. The Board did not believe the Applicant's evidence that he is a citizen of Sierra Leone based on three findings: the Applicant could not prove, on questioning by the Board, that he was familiar with the street names of the city of his residence in Sierra Leone being Freetown; the Applicant could not prove, on questioning by the Board, that he was familiar with the recent political history of the country due to his inability to provide details of date and names; and, that the basis of the Applicant's subjective fear of persecution was in contradiction to documentary evidence.

[2]                It is agreed that the means whereby the Board tested the Applicant's knowledge of Freetown is fundamentally flawed; the Board based its conclusion on a map of Freetown which is incomplete. Nevertheless, Counsel for the Respondent argues that, apart from this obvious error, the credibility finding should stand because of the contradiction between the Applicant's evidence and the documentary evidence.

[3]                I find that the credibility finding cannot be so dissected. It appears that the Board was careless in its questioning about the geography of Freetown, and I agree with Counsel for the Applicant that this fact contaminates the balance of the decision making.   

[4]                As a result, I find the Board's decision to be patently unreasonable.

                                                                       ORDER

Accordingly, I set aside the Board's decision and refer this matter to a differently constituted panel for re-determination.                                                              

                                                                                                                         "Douglas R. Campbell"          

                                                                                                                                                   J.F.C.                        


FEDERAL COURT

NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                       IMM-4623-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                     EMMANUEL BAAH

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:                                  MARCH 24, 2004

PLACE OF HEARING:                                TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER:                                                CAMPBELL J.

DATED:                                                          MARCH 25, 2004

APPEARANCES BY:                                     

Isak Grushka                                      For the Applicant

Rhonda Marquis                                             For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:         

            

Isak Grushka                                    

Toronto, Ontario.                                           For the Applicant

Morris Rosenberg,

Deputy Attorney General of Canada        For the Respondent


                                               

                               FEDERAL COURT

                                TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20040325

Docket: IMM-4623-03

BETWEEN:

           

EMMANUEL BAAH            

                                                                                Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                            Respondent

                                                                      

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                                      


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.