Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19980604

Docket: IMM-1472-97

BETWEEN:

                                                        XUNYAO HUANG,

                                                                                                                               Applicant,

                                                                   - and -

                     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION,

                                                                                                                           Respondent.

                                                  REASONS FOR ORDER

HEALD, D.J.

1�        This is an Application for Judicial Review to set aside the decision of Visa Officer John Maffett dated March 12, 1997 wherein he refused the applicant's application for a student visa in order to study hotel and restaurant operations at Constellation College in Toronto. Since the applicant was is Switzerland at the time, completing a similar course, his application was submitted to a Visa Officer in Bonn.

The Decision of the Visa Officer

2�        Visa Officer Maffett, after interviewing the applicant, noted from the correspondence, that the applicant had aspired to complete university studies in Canada but had provided no letter of acceptance from any Canadian university. The Visa Officer also observed: (a) the applicant had no apparent ties to the People's Republic of China (P.R.C.), his country of citizenship; (b) he was in Germany on a visitor's visa; (c) he had been in Hong Kong since leaving Switzerland and was staying with his mother and brother there. They had recently emigrated to Hong Kong from the P.R.C.

3�        Based on these circumstances, the Visa Officer concluded that the applicant was not a bona fide visitor and, that the real motivation for his application was the impending expiration of his status in Switzerland. On this basis, the Visa Officer refused his application for a student visa.

Issues

4�        1. Whether the application should be dismissed on the basis that the supporting affidavit relies primarily on the affiant's information and belief.

            2. Whether the Visa Officer properly exercised the discretion vested in him in refusing to grant a visa to the applicant.

Analysis

5�        1.        Information and belief.

            Failure to provide supporting affidavits based on personal knowledge does not automatically result in the dismissal of an application for judicial review. However, evidence provided in an affidavit based on information and belief is afforded little if any weight[1].

           

            The affidavit of Imelda On relies heavily on information and belief. To that extent, I give it little weight. The merits of this application can be better addressed by reference to the affidavit of Visa Officer Maffett together with the cross-examination thereon as well as those portions of the On affidavit that are not hearsay.

2.          Exercise of Discretion by the Visa Officer.

            I am not persuaded that the decision a quo was capricious or perverse.    The Visa Officer had regard to a number of relevant factors: the quality of the applicant's financial support; his ties to the People's Republic of China; and his need to find another country in which to live since his student's visa in Switzerland had expired

6�        I am not persuaded on this record that the Visa Officer committed reviewable error. The Visa Officer afforded to the applicant a full opportunity to address any concerns arising out of his initial assessment.

Conclusion

7�        Accordingly, and for the foregoing reasons, the within Application for Judicial Review is dismissed.

Certification

8�        Neither Counsel suggested certification of a serious question of general importance pursuant to Section 83 of the Immigration Act. I agree that this is not a case for certification.

                                                                                            "Darrel V. Heald"        

                                                                                                        D.J.

Toronto, Ontario

June 4, 1998


                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                          Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                                                                IMM-1472-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                         XUNYAO HUANG

                                                                                    - and -

                                                            THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                   

DATE OF HEARING:                                      JUNE 3, 1998

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                     HEALD, D.J.

DATED:                                                                        JUNE 4, 1998

APPEARANCES:                                                      

                                                                                    Mr. Timothy Leahy

                                                                                                For the Applicant

                                                                                    Mr. Brian A. Frimeth

                                                                                                For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                                   Timothy Leahy

                                                                                    408-5075 Yonge Street

                                                                                    North York, Ontario

                                                                                    M2N 6C6

                                                                                   

                                                                                                For the Applicant

                                                                                  George Thomson

                                                                                    Deputy Attorney General

                                                                                    of Canada

                                                                                                For the Respondent


                                                                                   


                                                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                   Date: 19980604

                                                                       

                                                                                                                    Docket:      IMM-1472-97

                                                                                    Between:

                                                                        XUNYAO HUANG

                                                                                                                                              Applicant

                                                                                    - and -

                                                            THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                       

                                                                                                                                          Respondent

                                                           

                                                                                                                                     

                                   

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

                                                                                                                                     



     [1]Wang v. M.E.I. (1991) 12 IMM L.R. 2d 178 (F.C.A.)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.