Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 611
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Brasserie La Chope, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $329.81 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,479.81.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 618
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Player's Club/Resto-Bar des Joueurs, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
K[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $362.64 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,512.64.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 612
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Bar Zazoo, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $371.74 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,521.74.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 613
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Broue Bouffe, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $359.96 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,509.96.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 614
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Guinness Pub Enr., asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $332.42 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,482.42.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 615
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Resto-Bar Blue Nose, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $420.17 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,570.17.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 616
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Restaurant-Pub Le Titanic, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $396.83 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,545.83.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 617
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Pub Ozone, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $344.37 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,494.37.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 619
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Moe's, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $329.81 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,479.81.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 620
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Cachette des sportifs, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $434.93 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,584.93.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 621
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Bar L'Entre Pot Enr., asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $360.82 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,510.82.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 622
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Bar La Grenouille, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $402.57 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,552.57.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 623
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Bar Benjy, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $329.81 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,479.81.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 624
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Bar 447, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $404.67 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,554.67.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec
Date: 20010608
Docket: T-1788-99
Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 625
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
[1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Rendez-vous des Ailes Tacos, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received.
[3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item.
[4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business.
[5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar.
[6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded.
[7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $386.12 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,536.12.
|
(signed)
François Pilon Assessment Officer |
Halifax, Nova Scotia
June 8, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99
BETWEEN:
INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff
- and -
2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL.
Defendants
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff
Montréal, Quebec