Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20050202

Docket: IMM-106-04

Citation: 2005 FC 166

Toronto, Ontario, February 2nd, 2005

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell                                

BETWEEN:

                                                              GUPREET SINGH

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                The present application concerns a young man living in Delhi who, in July 2003, applied for a student visa to study in Canada. From the Tribunal Record, I can see that he supplied a very detailed statement of his circumstances. A critical element of his application is that his expenses for his studies in Canada will be primarily borne by a Canadian citizen sponsor. As part of the application, the sponsor also filed detailed information of his circumstances.

[2]                In the Applicant's application for the visa his relationship to his sponsor is clearly stated in at least six places; the sponsor is a family friend. However, in the computer generated notes of the Visa Officer's rejection of the Applicant's application, on which I put weight, the following statement is made: "no proof of relationship to the sponsor in Canada provided so his financial documents cannot be relied upon" (Applicant's Application Record, p.12). It is clear from the decision that this is a central finding in the rejection of the Applicant's application. Given the clarity of the relationship provided in the Applicant's filed material, I find that the Visa Officer's statement is unsubstantiated and, thus, constitutes a reviewable error.

[3]                In my opinion, the erroneous finding made by the Visa Officer works an injustice to the Applicant because, as a result of the error, he was not provided with a full opportunity to have his application carefully considered.    Therefore, I find that the reviewable error renders the visa officer's decision as patently unreasonable.    

                                                                       ORDER

Accordingly, I set aside the Visa Officer's decision and refer the matter back to a different visa officer for redetermination. I direct that the redetermination be on the basis of the existing record supplied in the visa application under review, but also on the basis of any past or current additional information that the Applicant may wish to submit.

"Douglas R. Campbell"

                                                                                                                                                   J.F.C.                             


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           IMM-106-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:               GUPREET SINGH

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                     TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                       FEBRUARY 2, 2005   

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                             CAMPBELL J.

DATED:                                              FEBRUARY 2, 2005

APPEARANCES BY:                        

Chantal Desloges                                   For the Applicant

John Provart                                          For the Respondent

                                                                                                                                                           

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          

Green and Spiegel

Barristers and Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario                                   For the Applicant                      

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada     For the Respondent


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.