Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20210208


Docket: T-1270-19

Citation: 2021 FC 122

Ottawa, Ontario, February 8, 2021

PRESENT: Mr. Justice Norris

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA

Plaintiff

and

HORSESHOE VALLEY RANCH LTD.,

STACY ELVERN ESAU

AND ELVERN KENNETH ESAU

Defendants

JUDGMENT AND REASONS

[1] The Crown has moved for summary judgment against the defendants under Rule 213 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106.

[2] The underlying action seeks recovery of a debt allegedly owed by the defendants in relation to an advance payment made to Horseshoe Valley Ranch Ltd. by the British Columbia Breeders and Feeders Association in 2016 under the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Advance Payments Program, a program established under the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act, SC 1997, c 20 (“AMPA”).

[3] The background and the Court’s analysis of the issues arising are set out in the Court’s Judgment and Reasons in a related matter, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada v Elvern Kenneth Esau (Court File No. T-1075-19).

[4] For the reasons stated there, the motion is granted.


JUDGMENT IN T-1270-19

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that

  1. Summary judgment in the amount of $96,206.97 is granted in favour of the plaintiff;

  2. Pre-judgment interest shall be calculated on this amount from the date of July 31, 2019, in accordance with the terms of the Advance Payment application at the rate of BMO Prime Rate plus 1% calculated daily and compounded monthly;

  3. Post-judgment interest is fixed at an annual rate of 5.00 % per annum, as set by the Interest Act, RSC 1985, c I-15, section 3, from the date of this judgment;

  4. Costs shall be payable to the plaintiff in the fixed, all-inclusive amount of $2,303.41 in accordance with the bill of costs submitted.

“John Norris”

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

T-1270-19

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA v HORSESHOE VALLEY RANCH LTD ET AL

 

MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED AT OTTAWA , ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369 OF THE FEDERAL COURTS RULES

JUDGMENT AND REASONS:

NORRIS J.

 

DATED:

February 8, 2021

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

Don Klaassen

For The PLAINTIFF

 

Benjamin La Borie

For The DEFENDANTS

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Attorney General of Canada

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

 

For The PLAINTIFF

 

Bridgehouse Law LLP

Vancouver, British Columbia

For The DEFENDANTS

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.