Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040216

Docket: IMM-1070-04

Citation: 2004 FC 241

Toronto, Ontario, February 16th, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice von Finckenstein                                  

BETWEEN:

                                                 FRANCIS SEBAMALAI FIGURADO

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                          THE SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

(Delivered orally from the bench and written subsequently

for precision and clarification)

[1]                 This stay application arises from a negative Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) dated December 9th, 2003.

[2]                 To succeed in a stay application, an applicant must satisfy each element of the test set out in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 86 N.R.302 (F.C.A.).

[3]                 Before this Court, the Applicant argued that there were serious issues to be tried, namely that the PRRA Officer:

a) did not properly assess the risk faced by the Applicant at the hands of the LTTE but rather assessed only the risk generally faced by Tamil returnees; and

b) erred in law by finding that there was state protection available to the Applicant in Sri Lanka.

[4]                 A close reading of the PRRA Officer's decision reveals that neither of these allegations is supportable. The PRRA Officer, on the basis of the evidence submitted to her, addressed the risks faced by the Applicant (pages 9 and 11 of the Applicant's Record) as well as the state protection available in Sri Lanka (page 11 of the Applicant's Record).

[5]                 The evidence before the PRRA Officer was quite sufficient to support her findings.

[6]                 What the Applicant really asks for under the rubric of "serious issue" is a re-weighing of the evidence before the PRRA Officer.

[7]                 Such a request does not satisfy the requirement of "serious issue" under Toth, supra. See Thangasivan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Court File IMM-986-03, 23 November, 2003 (unreported).

[8]                 Accordingly, this request for a stay is denied.

                                                                            ORDER

THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion for a stay of the execution of the removal order is dismissed.                                    

             "K. von Finckenstein"

line

                                                                                                                                                               J.F.C.                          


FEDERAL COURT

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                    IMM-1070-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                   FRANCIS SEBAMALAI FIGURADO

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

and

THE SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR CANADA

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                           TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                               FEBRUARY 16, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY :                                  von FINCKENSTEIN J.

DATED:                                                        FEBRUARY 16, 2004

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Brena Parnes

FOR APPLICANT

Ms. Mielka Visnic

FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Waldman & Associates                                

Toronto, Ontario

FOR APPLICANT

                                                                                   

Morris Rosenberg                                                                          

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR RESPONDENT


                          FEDERAL COURT

TRIAL DIVISION

                                            

Date: 20040216

Docket: IMM-1070-04

BETWEEN:

FRANCIS SEBAMALAI FIGURADO

                                                                                         

                                                                         Applicant

and

THE SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR CANADA

                                                                     Respondent

                                                                           

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                                           

                                                                                         


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.