Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     Date: 20000609

     Docket: T-1391-99

Ottawa, Ontario, June 9, 2000

Present:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT


Between:

DANIEL AUDET,


Plaintiff,


- and -


HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

IN RIGHT OF CANADA,


Defendant.




ORDER


     The plaintiff's appeal from the decision of Prothonotary Morneau of May 17, 2000 is dismissed with costs, which the Court establishes at $500.


     J.

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.



Date: 20000609

     Docket: T-1391-99

Between:

DANIEL AUDET,


Plaintiff,


- and -


HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

IN RIGHT OF CANADA,


Defendant.




REASONS FOR ORDER

DENAULT J.


[1]      I stated at the outcome of the hearing of this appeal from Prothonotary Morneau's decision that it could not be allowed.

[2]      The plaintiff in this case has failed to show that the prothonotary erred in any way in dismissing his action based on the facts that had led the parties to a mutual transaction, the defendant having agreed to pay the plaintiff $105,000 in settlement of the relations between him and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and in particular his claims in files T-1793-95 and T-1794-95.

[3]      This transaction, the terms of which are clear, is completely unambiguous and has, between the parties, the authority of a final judgment (res judicata) (art. 2633 of the Civil Code). It forms a homogeneous unit, the terms of which cannot be split without distorting its meaning and thus betraying the intention of the parties (Léonard v. Mona Realties Ltd., [1973] C.A. 1034, p. 1039). Furthermore, if the Court were to allow the appeal and give the plaintiff leave to continue his action, it would have to restore the parties to the state in which they were before the transaction, thereby obliging the plaintiff to return the money he has received; the plaintiff, by his own admission, is unable and unwilling to do so.

[4]      For these reasons, the plaintiff's appeal from the decision of Prothonotary Morneau of May 17, 2000 is dismissed with costs, which the Court establishes at $500.



     J.

Ottawa, Ontario

June 9, 2000

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION


NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET NO:          T-1391-99     
STYLE:              Daniel Audet v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada

PLACE OF HEARING:      Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING:      June 5, 200

REASONS FOR ORDER OF DENAULT J.

DATED:              June 9, 2000


APPEARANCES:

Daniel Audet

Lavaltrie, Quebec                      THE PLAINTIFF REPRESENTING HIMSELF

Raymond Piché

Montréal, Quebec                      FOR THE DEFENDANT


SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                      FOR THE DEFENDANT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.