Date: 20050208
Docket: IMM-3945-04
Citation: 2005 FC 195
BETWEEN:
BASHUDEB ROY
Applicant
and
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR CANADA
Respondent
[1] This application is for judicial review of a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment ("PRRA") dated February 19, 2004.
[2] Counsel agreed that the standard of review is patent unreasonableness and were advised, at the conclusion of the hearing, that I found the decision to be patently unreasonable because the decision maker:
(a) Found that the applicant's family is involved in a family feud in Bangladesh;
(b) Found that the other family in the conflict is prepared to resort to extreme violence to settle scores;
(c) Found that an attack as part of the feud had led to the death of the applicant's father;
(d) Found that the applicant had already been involved in altercations with the opposing family.
(e) Concluded that there were not substantial grounds to support a finding of risk.
[3] In my view, this conclusion was patently unreasonable. For that reason, an order will be made referring the matter back for a fresh determination by another PRRA officer.
"Sandra J. Simpson"
JUDGE
Ottawa, Ontario
February 8, 2005
FEDERAL COURT
NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
STYLE OF CAUSE: BASHUDEB ROY v. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA
DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 18, 2005
DATED: FEBRUARY 8, 2005
APPEARANCES: Leigh Salsberg
Catherine Vasilaros
SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Waldman & Associates
Toronto, ON
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada