Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19971126


Docket: IMM-4676-97

BETWEEN:

     LI GUO XU,

     Applicant,

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION,

     Respondent.

     REASONS FOR ORDER

WETSTON, J.


[1]      The Application is for a stay of the execution of the Exclusion Order made against the Applicant on October 28, 1997. The test for a stay is three-fold, i.e., serious question, irreparable harm and balance of convenience.


[2]      An Application for judicial review of the Exclusion Order made against the Applicant has been filed, but leave has not yet been granted.


[3]      Is there a serious question in this case? In my opinion, despite the able arguments of counsel for the Applicant, the jurisprudence of this Court suggests that no serious question exists in this case. As in the decision of Nayci v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1995) 105 F.T.R. 122, issues of credibility underpin considerations as to the existence of a serious question in this matter. I have also considered the application of the principles in Dehghani v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1993] 1 S.C.R. 1053, which pre-dated certain amendments to the Immigration Act dealing with the secondary examination by an immigration officer. Nayci (supra) and Mbulu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1995) 29 Imm. L.R. (2d) 250, were decided after the Amendments and with Dehghani (supra) in mind.


[4]      In the event that I am incorrect with respect to the existence of serious question, there is, in my opinion, no irreparable harm. While serious jeopardy to life or safety of the person may be too high a standard in some cases, the harm that is claimed must, at the very least, be non-speculative and credible. In this sense, the existence of irreparable harm is fact specific. In this case, I am unable to conclude that irreparable harm exists.


[5]      Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider the balance of convenience and the Application for a stay is dismissed.

                                 (Sgd.) "Howard I. Wetston"

                                     Judge

Vancouver, British Columbia

26 November, 1997

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NO.:              IMM-4676-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:          LI GUO XU,

     Applicant,

                     - and -

                     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION,

     Respondent.

PLACE OF HEARING:          Vancouver, BC

DATE OF HEARING:          November 24, 1997

REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT BY: WETSTON, J.A.

DATED:                  November 26, 1997

APPEARANCES:

     Mr. P. Dimitrov              for Applicant
     Ms. W. Petersmeyer          for Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     Mr. Peter Dimitrov              for Applicant
     Barrister and Solicitor     
     George Thomson              for Respondent

     Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.