Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


    



Date: 19991214


Docket: IMM-5215-99

    


BETWEEN:

     HUNG PHAM

     Applicant


     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

    

     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

GILES A.S.P.:


[1]      In the motion before me the applicant moving party seeks an extension of time within which to file the applicant"s application record. In the motion the applicant has cited Valyenegro v. Canada (Secretary of State) (1994), 88 F.T.R. 196 as authority for three propositions in support of his motion for an extension of time.

[2]      In Valyenegro it was pointed out that it might be assumed that an applicant would be prejudiced if he or she is denied the right to put forward their case. The applicant here did not go on to point out the remainder of the paragraph, namely "If, however, the applicant does not have a case, he or she cannot be prejudiced if an extension of time is denied."

[3]      There, as here, there was no evidence tendered of the existence of an arguable case, so the motion for an extension was dismissed, as I shall do here. However, because there is a suggestion of grounds in the application for leave and for judicial review, the applicant may bring a further motion for an extension supported by better evidence by the 20th of January, 2000. In this regard, attention is directed to Rule 82 with regards to solicitor"s evidence in aid of motions.

                     ORDER

[4]      Motion dismissed without prejudice to the applicant"s right to move again for an extension of time based on better evidence on or before January 20, 2000.


                                 "Peter A. K. Giles"

     A.S.P.

TORONTO, ONTARIO

December 14, 1999


     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                      IMM-5215-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:                  HUNG PHAM

- and -

                         THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                         AND IMMIGRATION


CONSIDERED AT TORONTO, ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                  GILES A.S.P.

DATED:                      TUESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 1999

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY:          Mr. Trang Nguyen
                             For the Applicant
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          Trang Nguyen

                         Barrister & Solicitor

                         3875 Keele Street

                         Suite 206

                         North York, Ontario

                         M3J 1N6

                             For the Applicant
                         Morris Rosenberg

                         Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                             For the Respondent

                         FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


                                 Date: 19991214

                        

         Docket: IMM-5215-99


                         Between:

                         HUNG PHAM

                                        

Applicant



- and -



                         THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                         AND IMMIGRATION



Respondent



                        

            

                                                                         REASONS FOR ORDER

                         AND ORDER     

                        

    

    






 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.