Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20200102


Docket: IMM-6490-18

Citation: 2020 FC 2

Ottawa, Ontario, January 2, 2020

PRESENT:  The Honourable Mr. Justice Norris

BETWEEN:

AFERDITA MELLA (AKA FRIDA SHVRAC), SORELA MELLA, ESTER MELLA

Applicants

and

THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Respondent

SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS

[1]  On December 11, 2019, the Court released the Judgment and Reasons in this matter allowing the application for judicial review and remitting the matter to a different decision-maker for redetermination.

[2]  As part of the Court’s Judgment, counsel were given an opportunity to see how the Court disposed of the application before offering their positions on whether a question or questions should be certified under section 74(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27.

[3]  On December 18, 2019, counsel for the applicant wrote to the Court advising that the applicant did not wish to propose any question for certification. On December 19, 2019, counsel for the respondent submitted a letter also advising that the respondent did not wish to propose a question for certification.

[4]  I am satisfied that no questions of general importance warranting certification arise and none will be stated.


JUDGMENT IN IMM-6490-18

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that

  1. No question of general importance is stated.

“John Norris”

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

IMM-6490-18

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

AFERDITA MELLA (AKA FRIDA SHVRAC) ET AL v THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

July 15, 2019

 

SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS:

NORRIS J.

 

DATED:

January 2, 2020

 

APPEARANCES:

Hart A. Kaminker

Anab Jamal

 

For The ApplicantS

 

Nimanthika Kaneira

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Kaminker and Associates

Barristers and Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The ApplicantS

 

Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.