Date: 19981104
Docket: T-269-98
Ottawa, Ontario, the 4th day of November 1998
Present: the Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard
IN THE MATTER OF the Citizenship Act,
R.S.C., 1985, c. C-29
AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the decision
of a Citizenship Judge
AND IN THE MATTER OF
Yan Mei Jiang
Appellant
JUDGMENT
The appeal from the decision of a Citizenship Judge, dated January 15, 1998, refusing the appellant"s application for citizenship, is dismissed.
YVON PINARD
JUDGE
Certified true translation
M. Iveson
Date: 19981104
Docket: T-269-98
IN THE MATTER OF the Citizenship Act,
R.S.C., 1985, c. C-29
AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the decision
of a Citizenship Judge
AND IN THE MATTER OF
Yan Mei Jiang
Appellant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
PINARD J.:
[1] This is an appeal, in the nature of a de novo proceeding, from a decision of a Citizenship Judge, dated January 15, 1998, refusing the appellant"s application for citizenship on the ground that she did not meet the residence requirements set out in paragraph 5(1)(c ) of the Citizenship Act (the Act). This provision reads as follows:
| 5. (1) The Minister shall grant citizenship to any person who . . . (c) has been lawfully admitted to Canada for permanent residence, has not ceased since such admission to be a permanent resident pursuant to section 24 of the Immigration Act, and has, within the four years immediately preceding the date of his application, accumulated at least three years of residence in Canada calculated in the following manner:
(Emphasis added.) |
5. (1) Le ministre attribue la citoyenneté à toute personne qui, à la fois : . . . c) a été légalement admise au Canada à titre de résident permanent, n'a pas depuis perdu ce titre en application de l'article 24 de la Loi sur l'immigration, et a, dans les quatre ans qui ont précédé la date de sa demande, résidé au Canada pendant au moins trois ans en tout, la durée de sa résidence étant calculée de la manière suivante:
(Mon emphase.) |
[2] The appellant"s application for citizenship is dated May 26, 1997, and she entered Canada for the first time on June 30, 1994. It is accordingly clear, in light of these material dates, that the appellant could not have been resident in Canada during the required minimum period of three years.
[3] The appellant explained that her haste to make her application for citizenship was due to her ignorance of the Act and her faith in information obtained from public servants who allegedly told her that she could make her application up to six months before accumulating three years of residence in Canada. Unfortunately, these excuses are not valid in law. As I am bound by the Act and particularly paragraph 5(1)(c), supra, I must conclude, as did the Citizenship Judge, that the application for citizenship was premature. As I indicated to the appellant during the hearing, she may always bring a new application for citizenship if the requirements of the Act are met.
[4] For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.
YVON PINARD
JUDGE
OTTAWA, ONTARIO
November 4, 1998
Certified true translation
M. Iveson
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT NO.: T-269-98
STYLE OF CAUSE: Citizenship v. Yan Mei Jiang
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: October 21, 1998
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard
DATED: November 4, 1998
APPEARANCES:
Yan Mei Jiang for the appellant (representing herself)
Jean Caumartin for the amicus curiae
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Jean Caumartin
Montréal, Quebec for the amicus curiae