Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020815

Docket: IMM-5469-00

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 871

BETWEEN:

                                                                 AZIZ UR RAHMAN

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

                                                                              - and -

                                                                THE MINISTER OF

                                                CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

ROTHSTEIN J.A. (ex officio)

                                                                                   

  •         This is a judicial review of a decision of a visa officer which denied the applicant's application for permanent residence in the occupation of a social worker. The basis of the decision was that the applicant did not have a bachelor's degree in social work as required for the occupation of social work in the National Occupational Classification (NOC).

[2]                 The applicant had an MA in Social Anthropology from Peshawar University in Pakistan. He says this was, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to a degree in social work. At the very least, he says, if the visa officer was in doubt on this point, he should have been given an opportunity to clear up any ambiguity.

[3]                 Upon a review of the record, it appears that all references to the applicant's education are to a degree in anthropology or social anthropology. The courses taken by the applicant e.g. Principles of Anthropology, Ethnography, Applied Anthropology, Political Anthropology, confirm that the substance of his education was anthropology.

[4]                 I do not overlook the fact that some of his courses might have some relationship to social work e.g. Criminology, or perhaps, Field Work. The applicant says that courses change over time and that the substance of an anthropology degree could be considered the same as a social work degree. If that were correct, it seems to me that the applicant was obliged to make that point in his visa application. He did not. The NOC requirement is a degree in social work. On its face, the applicant did not have that degree. I cannot say that the visa officer erred in finding that he did not meet the employment requirements for the occupation of social worker.


[5]                 Nor do I think there was an obligation on the visa officer to interview the applicant or make further inquiries as to whether his degree in anthropology was equivalent to a degree in social work. Apart from the fact that there was no obligation on the visa officer to conduct an interview on the facts of this case, there was no ambiguity to clear up. The applicant says the visa officer seems to have been under a misapprehension, but that is not apparent from the record. She saw that the applicant did not have a degree in social work and that he, therefore, did not meet the employment requirements for the social work occupation. There was no ambiguity.

[6]                 The applicant says that the visa officer misconstrued a letter of reference as not indicating experience in social work. However, this issue does not arise. Because he did not have a degree in social work, he did not meet the employment requirements for the job of social worker. The visa officer was obliged to deny his application for that reason alone.

[7]                 The judicial review should be dismissed.

  

"Marshall Rothstein"

                                                                                                                                                                       

line                                                                                                                                                                Judge                          

Toronto, Ontario

August 15, 2002


                        FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

             Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                                              IMM-5469-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:              AZIZ UR RAHMAN

Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                         TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                           WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 2002   

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:             ROTHSTEIN J.

DATED:                                                    THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2002

APPEARANCES BY:                              Mr. Rocco Galati

For the Applicant

Mr. David Tyndale, and

Ms. Pamela Larmondin

For the Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                       

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                 Galati, Rodrigues, Azevedo & Associates

Barristers & Solicitors

203-637 College St.

Toronto, Ontario

M6G 1B5

For the Applicant             

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                         Date:20020815

                Docket: IMM-5469-00

BETWEEN:

AZIZ UR RAHMAN

Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                  Respondent

                                                   

REASONS FOR ORDER

                                                   

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.