Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     Date: 20000920

     Docket: T-593-96

BETWEEN:


HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA


Plaintiff


- and -


JOSEPH MARC BERNARD PATRICE LAVOIE


Defendant



ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

FRANÇOIS PILON

Assessment Officer


[1]      On July 24, 2000, the plaintiff, represented by Mr. Étienne Trépanier, filed his bill of costs pursuant to the order of the Court rendered on March 12, 1999, and asked that it be assessed without personal appearance of the parties. The defendant, Mr. Lavoie, had until September 15, 2000 to file written representations. To date, no representations have been received from him.

[2]      In view of the foregoing and the criteria listed in subsection 400(3) of the Federal Court Rules, fees in the amount of $1,350.00 are awarded for services rendered under items 1 (5 units), 4 (3 units), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (4 units).

[3]      The disbursement of $52.30 for process server's fees is awarded, as is the Equifax Canada bill in the amount of $423.72. The latter expenditure was occasioned by the plaintiff, in order to obtain some information on the defendant's solvency before suing in the Federal Court.

[4]      The plaintiff's costs will therefore be assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,350.00 for fees and $567.02 for disbursements. A certificate shall issue in the amount of $1,917.02.


Halifax, Nova Scotia

September 20, 2000

     François Pilon
     Assessment Officer

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION




DOCKET NO:          T-593-96

STYLE:      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA


Plaintiff


- and -


JOSEPH MARC BERNARD PATRICE LAVOIE


Defendant


ASSESSMENT IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

REASONS OF FRANÇOIS PILON, Assessment Officer

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia

DATE OF REASONS: September 20, 2000     


SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                          For the plaintiff

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.