Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20190513


Docket: IMM-1222-18

Citation: 2019 FC 644

Ottawa, Ontario, May 13, 2019

PRESENT:  The Honourable Mr. Justice Norris

BETWEEN:

AZLLAN PAJAZITAJ

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Respondent

SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS

[1]  On April 30, 2019, the Court released the Judgment and Reasons in this matter dismissing the application for judicial review.

[2]  As part of the Court’s Judgment, counsel were asked to provide written submissions with respect to whether any serious question of general importance should be certified under section 74(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act no later than 4:00 p.m. EST on May 7, 2019.

[3]  Both parties acknowledged receiving the Judgment and Reasons on April 30, 2019.

[4]  On May 6, 2019, counsel for the respondent wrote to indicate that, in his view, no questions for certification arise from the Court’s decision.

[5]  To date, counsel for the applicant has not communicated any position, nor has he requested an extension of time to do so.

[6]  I am satisfied that no questions of general importance warranting certification arise and none will be stated.


JUDGMENT IN IMM-1222-18

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that

  1. No question of general importance is stated.

“John Norris”

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

IMM-1222-18

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

AZLLAN PAJAZITAJ v THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

OctOber 31, 2018

 

SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS:

NORRIS J.

 

DATED:

May 13, 2019

 

APPEARANCES:

Michael Loebach

 

For The Applicant

 

Lorne McClenaghan

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Michael Loebach

Barrister and Solicitor

London, Ontario

 

For The Applicant

 

Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.