Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20011127

Docket: T-79-01

Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 1296

BETWEEN:

                   COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC.

DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC.,

METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC.,

PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION,

TRISTAR PICTURES, INC.,

TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION,

UNITED ARTISTS CORPORATION,

UNITED ARTISTS PICTURES INC.,

UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC.,

WARNER BROS., a division of

TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., L.P.

                                                               Applicants

                                   and

            STÉPHANE CARON, doing business under the name

of "MARCHÉAUX PUCES CHEZ DAN"

and MARIO CARON

                                                              Respondents

                          REASONS FOR ORDER

BLAIS J.

[1]                 This is a motion for an order that security for costs be given.


[2]                 The respondents base their motion particularly on the fact that the applicants are all multinationals incorporated in the U.S. and that their head offices are not located in Canada. The respondents contend that they are entitled to assume that the applicants have no assets in Canada, and that they should be required to deposit security to guarantee that costs, if awarded, may be recovered.

[3]                 At the hearing, counsel for the respondent established that the costs that are foreseeable at present amount to $2,640 and not $22,000, as was initially stated in the motion, and she also asked to be allowed to reserve her rights to make a further request for costs incurred subsequently.

[4]                 Counsel for the applicants clearly established at the hearing, and in fact the respondents admitted, that the respondents had pleaded guilty to criminal offences involving the same events as in this case: that they had sold descramblers to an individual who turned out to be an RCMP officer.                                       

[5]                 Since the respondents have admitted their liability, the applicants quite reasonably wonder what argument the respondents can have for saying that the applicants might evade a court order in their favour.

[6]                 Rather, the respondents contend that it will be difficult for the applicants to establish that they did in fact sustain damages, and this could leave the door open for the claim to be dismissed on that point. The applicants replied that in cases where the infringing items had been seized in their entirety, the courts nonetheless awarded the applicants nominal damages in some cases.


[7]                 In light of the evidence in the record at present, I have no hesitation in concluding that the applicants' case is solid and that there is already an admission of criminal liability by the defendants in the record.

[8]                 The defendants failed to satisfy me that it was in the interest of justice that security for costs be authorized in the circumstances, having regard to the respondents' minimal chances of success in this case.

                                                                            ORDER

[9]                 This motion for an order that security for costs be given is accordingly dismissed with costs payable by the respondents.

Pierre Blais                                                   

Judge

OTTAWA, ONTARIO

November 27, 2001

Certified true translation

Sophie Debbané, LL.B.


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD    

COURT FILE NO.: T-79-01           

STYLE OF CAUSE: COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES INC. ET AL V. STÉPHANE                                                  CARON ET AL       

PLACE OF HEARING: Québec, Quebec                               

DATE OF HEARING: November 16, 2001                          

REASONS AND ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE BLAIS J.

DATED: November 27, 2001

APPEARANCES:                               

Daniel Ovadia                                                                                  FOR THE APPLICANT

Stéphanie Lindsay                                                                         FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Ovadia Sauvageau                               FOR THE APPLICANT

Montréal, Quebec

Guy Bertrand & Associés                        FOR THE RESPONDENT

Québec, Quebec                 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.